‘Good project managers are hard to find’ – that is a complaint often heard within large organisations. Yet, our data fails to show a strong link between either the scarcity or availability of good project managers and the success of strategic initiatives. This may seem like a surprise finding but when you look closer it begins to make sense.
The data reveals that it takes more than effective management to ensure the success of today’s more complex and ambitious Strategic Projects and Initiatives. Leadership is essential to the Project BIG 4 – speed, agility, innovation and collaboration.
Like so many other organizational resources – from manpower to cash – the pool of experienced project managers is limited. With multiple competing projects and initiatives, there is often a scramble to get the best project managers.
This competition is hardly surprising as the experience and reputation of the project manager has traditionally been seen as critical to project success. Moreover, the caliber of the manager appointed to a project is often seen as a tangible indicator of organizational commitment. But as the level of complexity and innovation required by critical projects has grown, the requirements in terms of project leadership have changed too.
There is growing evidence that the role and importance of the project manager may be over-estimated, especially in respect of those more complex and ambitious strategic initiatives.
Even if every initiative had a qualified project manager at the helm there would still be a lot of struggling projects. That is because complex and ambitious strategic initiatives don’t just need management to be successful, they need leadership too.
Project Management may be at an all-time low in terms of its popularity. However, the ‘project manager is not enough’ message in no way takes from the need for the application of project rigor around work-plans, timelines, budgets, risk management, etc. These are as important, if not more important than ever. However, assuming you have got these there is still something else needed. In addition to effective management, you need leadership too.
In most areas of business or indeed life leadership is valued ahead of management. The success of ambitious strategies and the initiatives or projects that bring them to life demands vision, inspiration and innovation. These are just some of the things that distinguish leadership from management – the rest are shown in the table below.
|Vision & Inspiration|
Energy & Motivation
To gauge the level of project management and leadership in respect of your strategic initiative use the table above. On a scale of 1-10, how would your project rate on those factors in the left column? How would it rate against those factors in the right column?
Ambitious strategic initiatives require change – a departure in some way from the status quo. They often involve a journey into the new and unfamiliar – perhaps a new innovation or a new direction. In these situations, leadership is essential to providing the confidence to move forward.
There is more to a successful strategic initiative, than effective project management. This is doubly so in respect of traditional project management with its tendency towards bureaucratic control and rigidity.
For projects that demand greater speed and agility, as well as collaboration and innovation, traditional project management could actually inhibit success.
Yet, when project risk or complexity goes up it is tempting to turn the dial on project management control. Hallmarks include:
While such measures may make the project manager feel better – providing greater visibility and control – they often come at a price. In particular, they can kill speed and agility, preventing people from taking ownership or even taking action. Going too far down the ‘project management rabbit hole’ (as one of our colleagues describes it) can magnify rather than diminish project risk.
Now that we have discussed the importance of leadership to the success of projects and initiatives, you are probably thinking of who the leader could or should be and the qualities that they must have. While such an inspirational and visionary person may well be an asset to a project, the type of leadership most linked to success does not rest in one person.
The leadership requirement for most projects is not a single person, but rather a more distributed form of leadership. Rather than resting with an individual, leadership responsibilities and accountability are ideally shared by those who are directly involved in running the project and have the required skills and knowledge. In this way the success of the project becomes a collective responsibility.
Too many projects already depend on a heroic solo run by one or a few people. Rather than being something to be celebrated, this often indicates a lack of widespread ownership or effective collaboration within a project team.
Distributed Leadership means distributed vision, inspiration, motivation, passion, innovation and so on – all those leadership factors in the table shown earlier.
“An organization has little to fear from the future, or its competitors, when it’s brimming with self-managing “micropreneurs.”
Gary Hamel & Michele Zanini1
As organisations and their projects get more complex, attention has increasingly turned to a ‘post-heroic’ model of leadership2. This recognizes that:
Most projects don’t need another hero3 They need a dedicated team of people who can get the job done and whose passion, vision and innovation will inspire and engage others to contribute along the way.
If people are sitting around waiting to be told what to do, or need direction at every turn then the talent quotient on a project comes into question.
Perhaps the defining characteristic of project leadership is where all the key people working on a project are progressively realizing more and more of their potential and performing to the fullest of their abilities.
Typically, it is easier to plug a gap in Project Management than in leadership. Here are some of the reasons why:
However, it is hard for one leader in isolation to hold these views unless they are consistent with the culture of the organization. Moreover, if people are to rise to the challenge of distributed leadership they must feel that it will be rewarded and is safe.
Want to quickly assess the level of distributed leadership for any project? Observe the number of people and perspectives that are heard at project meetings. If a few people do all the talking, while the rest stay silent then leadership is likely neither distributed or effective.
Too many project managers must go ‘cap in hand’ to senior management when something is needed. It is as if they were a child going to a parent for approval – additional resources, a change to the project plan, a revision of the timeline, etc.
It suits many senior executives to keep their project managers subservient. But by limiting autonomy they stifle ownership, agility and innovation. Going up the ‘chain of command’ to get the required sign-offs and approvals can tie people up in paperwork and really slow things down.
Teams must be set up for success. That means ensuring that the right people are in the right roles, etc. Nothing hinders the leadership quotient of a project team more than the absence of key people in key roles – it strips the team of self-sufficiency and means it must go outside for help, advice or direction. Often over-looked this is called design, or in recognition of its importance, performance design. It requires ensuring that the right people are in the right roles, doing the right work, with then right resources, etc.
There is another reason why we emphasize the word ‘leadership’ when it comes the execution of strategy. It is the problems that arise because those who create the strategy typically delegate its execution to others. But the vision, passion and inspiration are needed as much in execution as in strategizing. Ensuring effective execution of the strategy is a key responsibility of leadership.
It is not just the project team that requires effective leadership, the project’s stakeholders need leadership too. That includes internal and external stakeholders such as customers, suppliers, internal collaborators (other departments and functions), corporate management and so on.